When ducks in other parts of silicon valley face the impact of Facebook.


San Francisco – in congressional testimony this week, sitting in front of mark zuckerberg two pages of notes in the binder, suggested that Facebook’s chief executive, rarely have the opportunity to provide information: we are not the only one.
Zuckerberg is prepared to say that his company has only a small fraction of the $650 billion advertising market, and that it has many competitors. Google, for example, has more than twice the size of Facebook’s online advertising business. GuGe also collects a lot of information about the use of its online services.
But as Facebook in dealing with the user’s personal information has the support of the chin, leaders of other technology companies have proved that even in silicon valley, the public desire to billionaire managers and its vast empire is entirely possible to keep a low profile.
Is Mr Zuckerberg different? The personal information of up to 87 million Facebook users ended up in the hands of an analysis firm, Cambridge analytics, which partnered with trump in the 2016 presidential election. GuGe and the biggest technology company – as anyone knows – never made such a big mistake.
Mr. Zuckerberg was the only executive to testify at a two-day hearing this week. Google chief executive Sundar Pichai and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey were also asked to testify before the senate judiciary committee.
But Mr. Pichai and Mr. Dorsey were freed when the hearing was combined with another hearing that did not require GuGe or Twitter to participate, company officials and congressional aides said.
At least for now.
Before Tuesday’s hearing, Iowa republican and senate judiciary committee chairman Charles e. Grassley wrote to Mr. Pichai and Mr. Dorsey on 14 questions. In a letter to Google, Mr Grasley wanted to “understand how Google manages and monitors the privacy of the vast amounts of data collected by users.”
[2 days, 10 hours, 600 questions: learn about mark zuckerberg’s trip to Washington.]
The companies will not be able to respond until April 25. When asked if they were worried about congressional or regulatory scrutiny, GuGe and Twitter declined to comment through company representatives.

“Outside of Facebook, probably no company is more concerned than Google,” said Jason Kint, a regular at Google and Facebook and chief executive of Digital Content Next, a trade group that represents entertainment and news organizations. Times. “They’re definitely hiding from Facebook. They don’t want to try to trip up any alarms. ”
Like Facebook, Google collects huge amounts of data from users – including their YouTube choices, Internet search and location history – to locate ads. Facebook has more than 2 billion users worldwide, but Google has seven products, including YouTube, Gmail and Android, each with more than 1 billion users.
On Wednesday, when John Shimkus, an Illinois republican, questioned Facebook’s track record of being deactivated, Mr Zuckerberg quickly pointed out that GuGe and “other industries” had adopted a similar strategy. This is one of several Google data practices mentioned during the two days of hearings.
Mr. Zuckerberg didn’t have a chance to say more about his Facebook peers this week. Google was cited by lawmakers 11 times during the two-day hearing. Twitter was mentioned 10 times and amazon was mentioned. Apple has been mentioned three times, most of them by the way.
Google employees say they have not yet received clear orders from management to keep a low profile because most people already know the risks. One employee, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that because employees were not allowed to speak publicly about the issue, there was an understanding inside GuGe that the company was clearly the next target.
Google spokesman Aaron Stein said in a statement, if it finds evidence of “fraud or misuse of personal data”, the company “fully focus on protect user data” and “would take action”.
Google’s privacy practices for years have been criticized – and even fined. It paid $17 million in fines to settle a case that bypassed apple’s Safari privacy Settings to track users and display ads to them in 2011 and 2012. It also captures people’s passwords, E-mail and other personal information mapping projects in the street view view.
Privacy advocates also criticized a GuGe social network, called Buzz, in 2010 to automatically include users’ email contacts. Google eventually settled the matter with the federal trade commission and agreed to strengthen existing privacy programs.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here